CHEAPCLIX.NET

Apparently.

This is a very astute comment made by “bildo69″ on the Star Tribune web site.

Pretty Sad how the whistleblower wanted severance

He (Steven Keough) was a whistleblower, claiming he knew it was a criminal enterprise, but he was demanding a severance paid by illicitly gained funds?

No matter how you cut it -  no matter the outcome for iNetGlobal in the USA Court - innocent or guilty, Steven Keough committed a crime.  In his short tenure at iNetGlobal, he learned ONE OF THREE POSSIBILITIES, AND THOSE POSSIBILITIES ARE MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE.

1)  Keough learned little or nothing about iNetGlobal, therefore could make no determination of guilt versus innocence.

or

2)  Keough learned plenty about iNetGlobal, and the fact that they have valuable and powerful internet marketing products and services, and make real profits, thus making it a lie to accuse the company of a Ponzi Scheme.

or

3) Keough learned plenty about iNetGlobal, to the extent that he could make a judgment that he could blow the whistle and convince the USA Government that it is a Ponze Scheme.

__________________________________________________________________

Assume for a minute that #1, above, is correct.  Then Keough commited a crime.  As acting CEO, Keough had the opportunity and the responsibility to learn more, to work on fixing the areas that might be of concern to him, and to help people throughout the organization understand the importance of knowing about the products.  After all, one of the big concerns was and is (to the iNetGlobal critics) that there were lots of non-English-speaking members.  Keough represented to the iNetGlobal members and staff that he was fluent in Chinese.  Also, remember, the iNetGlobal web site has the option available to be read in Chinese.  His crimes, given Possibility #1 –  plentiful, not the least of which is dereliction of duty.

Now let’s assume that Possibility #2 is correct.  The obvious conclusion, given this is correct, then Keough lied to the USA Government.

Finally, let’s assume that Possibility #3 is correct.  Give this possibility, then Keough is obviously guilty of the crime of attempting to extract, or extort, “illicitly gained funds”, –  a point so aptly declared by “bildo69″ with his comment on the Star Tribune blog.

Unless I am missing something, a criminal case against Steven Keough appears to be an “open and shut” no-brainer.

Thanks for visiting! If you haven't already done so and would like, please subscribe to this blog so I can keep you up to date on all current activities.

inetglobal blow whistle ponzi scheme, criminal case steven keough no brainer, ineternet marketing products services, inetglobal comments star tribune, inetglobal ponzi scheme, inetglobal star tribune, inetglobal usa court innocent or guilty, inetglobal valuable powerful internet products, is steven keough criminal, keough demanding severence illicitly gained funds, keough extort extortion inetglobal illicit funds, lie inetglobal ponzi scheme, no brainer case steven keough inetglobal, ponzi scheme whistleblower, star tribune blog, star tribune com, star tribune web site, steven keough ceo inetglobal, steven keough criminal enterprise, steven keough dereliction duties, steven keough inetglobal case, steven keough whistleblower whistle blower, whistleblower wanted severance criminal enterprise

iNetGlobal Alleges USA Government Leaking of Confidential Warrant Affidavit

iNetGlobal Requests Relief and New Government Agency to Investigate

_________________________________________________________

Below is the text of the motions made by iNetGlobal Attorney, Jon M. Hopeman, of Minneapolis, MN, USA, Office of FELHABER, LARSON, FENLON & VOGT, P.A.  This writer has further documents (which will be posted soon on this site) which strongly suggest claims of extortion attempts of iNetGlobal by former CEO Steven Keough, — and documents that appear to validate iNetGlobal claims of illegal leaks by the USA Government to the press with regard to confidential warrant affidavits (leaks that were made to the press media prior to being made available to iNetGlobal, itself).  Please keep posted on this site for further developments.

Motions Filed:

64770.1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Mag. No. 10-MJ-71 (FLN)
In Re Search Warrants of February 23,
2010, and Later Days STEVEN RENNER S MOTION FOR
RETURN OF PROPERTY UNDER
FED. R. CR. PRO. 41(g) AND OTHER
RELIEF
Steven Mark Renner by his counsel, Felhaber, Larson, Fenlon & Vogt, P.A. and Jon M. Hopeman, hereby move the Court for the following relief:

1. Ordering the government to return to Steven Mark Renner and his companies all items seized by the government by means of search warrants executed at Mr. Renner s companies on February 23, 2010, and in subsequent days.

2. Ordering the government to return to Steven Mark Renner and his companies all funds seized by the government by means of seizure warrants executed upon Mr. Renner s bank accounts and upon the bank accounts of his companies on February 23, 2010 and in subsequent days. Mr. Renner and his companies seek return of all customer funds, employees funds, and funds belonging to the companies.

3. Ordering the government to return to Steven Mark Renner and his companies all attorney-client privileged items seized by the government by means of the search warrants executed at Mr. Renner s companies on February 23, 2010, and in subsequent days and barring review of the same by a taint team.

4. Granting an evidentiary hearing. 64770.1 2

5. Alternatively, appointing a Special Master and ordering preparation of a report to the court within 45 days on the question of whether there was a fraudulent scheme at Inter-Mark and whether monies should be returned to the business, its employees, and customers.

6. Referring to another federal agency for investigation the matter of the leak of the search warrant affidavit to the press, and ordering a report be prepared for the court and parties within 45 days.

7. Enjoining and restraining the government from informing witnesses, customers, and employees that Mr. Renner and his companies and employees were running a Ponzi scheme upon those customers and others, and from leaking confidential information to the press.

8. For such other relief as the Court deems just.

This motion is made upon Fed. R. Cr. Pro. 41(g) and upon the grounds stated in the attached declaration and memorandum of law.

Dated: March 25, 2010

Respectfully submitted,
FELHABER, LARSON, FENLON & VOGT, P.A.
By s/ Jon M. Hopeman
Jon M. Hopeman, #47065
220 South Sixth Street, Suite 2200
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402
(612) 339-6321
(612) 33-0535 (fax)
jhopeman@felhaber.com
ATTORNEYS FOR STEVEN MARK RENNER

Inet Global allegations steven keough extortion inetglobal, felhaber larson fenlon vogt attorneys, government taint team inetglobal, inetglobal bank accounts, inetglobal court relief, inetglobal evidentiary hearing, inetglobal fraud allegations, inetglobal legal court motions, inetglobal motion for return relief, inetglobal ponzi scheme, inetglobal privileged items seized, inetglobal search warrant leak, inetglobal seized funds, inetglobal seized seizure warrent, inetglobal seizure warrant, inetglobal special master, inetglobal usa government investigation, intermark inetglobal parent, jon m hopeman inetglobal attorney court, new government agency investigation inetglobal request, press leak inetglobal warrant affidavit, restrain government inetglobal ponzi scheme, steve keough inetglobal ceo, steven mark renner inetglobal, usa government leak confidential information inetglobal, usa government media leaks inetglobal, usa government press leak inetglobal

WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND.  INETGLOBAL SCAM and PONZI CHARGES ARE TO BE EMBARASSING TO SOME!

***********************************************

Here is an example of somebody who is going to be embarassed, I believe:

Former InetGlobal Rep
scott.fricke@gmail.com | 216.20.178.20

What a load of crap. I got out because the whole system was nothing but a ponzi. Products? What products? I could not find one product of value that anyone would pay for if there wasn’t a promise of a big return to go with it.

******************************************************

My speculation is that Mr. Fricke is ticked off at iNetGlobal because it is NOT a Ponzi.  I will go further to suggest that Mr. Fricke never attended an MIT training session — never bothered to learn anything about the vast array of tools that are available on the V-services tab –  instead, got angry because there was NOT a big return without earning it — without learning anything.  ENOUGH ABOUT SCOTT FRICKE.

Tonight, my wife and I leave India to return to the USA, and we are on a mission.  Our mission is to communicate to the U.S.A Government, and more importantly, to the USA people, that the iNetGlobal Raid was a false alarm.  In India, we have met hundreds of people,  very technically-savvy people, honest hard working people –  people who have bothered to actually learn something about the value of the iNetGlobal products.  What is their parting request, as we embark on our trip back home?  Clearly, the message of the Indian people is:  Go back to America and tell everyone:  “The iNetGlobal Raid was a false alarm”.

Much more to come!  Ken

Inet Global, Multi Level Marketing india internet savvy, inetglobal false alarm, inetglobal india, inetglobal internet marketing advertising products, inetglobal ponzi scheme, inetglobal products, inetglobal raid seizure, inetglobal scam, inetglobal scott fricke, inetglobal usa goverment raid, inetglobal usa government raid seizure