iNetGlobal, Why They Should Win Versus USA Government
If the June 11th interim settlement agreement is any kind of a harbinger (iNetGlobal’s execution of the history-making funds-release pact with the USA Government), it should be a reasonable prediction that the company is prevailing in its pre-litigation efforts. Clearly, this agreement is an historically rare event — perhaps unprecedented. Why should iNetGlobal win? There are a lot of reasons why, — none the least of which are its worldwide internet presence and its international perspective of the marketing team members. It is no accident that iNetGlobal has an Alexa rating that is very near the top 10,000 in the world. This is true, while the “usa.gov” site is ranked only 3000 above that of iNetGlobal. One could thus conclude that iNetGlobal understands the internet better than the government understands it, given that there are a few hundred million users of “usa.gov” in contrast to an exponentially-growing few tens of thousands of iNetGlobal product-users. So, what does that have to do with this case? Perhaps the USA Government’s learning-curve has trended upward during the process of these past 4 months since their ill-advised raid on February 24th in Minneapolis. Perhaps they have had some eyes opened by people “up the G-scale”. I might even dare to say that in the upcoming week, further evidence will be presented that might result in the powers-that-be asking “what the hell did we do here?”
iNetGlobal, as a company under seige, has managed to do a horrific amount of homework to defend itself against the allegation that it is a Ponzi Scheme, and to the best of my knowledge, it is that homework that has resulted in the agreement referenced above. Furthermore, there is a great deal more of that expensive homework that is about to be presented (presumably this week) that will show the Government Attorneys the reality of the iNetGlobal products, the legality of its marketing plan, the accountability of its profitability – all factors that evidence the antithesis of a Ponzi Scheme.
One of the sad things about the Commerce Laws in America today is that the USA Government has the power to put a company such as iNetGlobal under its seizure without the benefit of reasonable investigation and due process, rendering that company almost helpless, financially, to get its day in court. The government can do this, absent of indictments – all at the stroke of a pen. Never-the-less, iNetGlobal has managed to retain the professionals and the independent investigators that are a necessary part of winning this arduous fight. Its reports are in place, and they are ready for the justice system to hear their case. Meanwhile, the wheels of justice turn very very slowly, and it is frustrating to watch. When this entire matter culminates into a grand re-opening, do not expect to get an apology, and do not expect a big mainstream media announcement. In fact, we do not even want that. We just want to be left alone to use our products, to sell our products, and to exercise our rights to succeed in the world market that we have all worked so hard to gain a foothold.
You, the members, have read about the agreement of June 11th. To many, it may have seemed like a non-event. Quite the contrary. It was historical. The Government is not known to capitulate on matters such as even allowing a company to breathe after a raid and seizure that involves the kinds of allegations they are enduring. The upcoming week is equally significant, I am told.
Here are a couple of quotes from a recent email received from one of the marketing team-leaders: “Sorry for the communication shutdown over the last 30 days but a silence request was made to allow the negotiations with the Government to go smoothly.” — “In fact we have recently won a huge victory with the federal authorities who have decided that for the time being it needs to work with iNetGlobal on these issues vs going the legal route. I believe our business is reflecting more positively on their (the USA) lawyers than their first hyped up look at our business.” This team-leader is a master of understatement! In essence, the statement is: “The Government attorneys are seeing things differently than they first thought.”
The Bottom Line is: Could they not have handled this with some thought about one of the basic tenets of our system – “Innocent until proven guilty”??? In any event, expect some things to happen this week, and expect it to be very positive.
Thanks for visiting! If you haven't already done so and would like, please subscribe to this blog so I can keep you up to date on all current activities.
Recent Comments