CHEAPCLIX.NET

photo credit: James Trosh

 

_________________________________________________________

This communication has been received by Ken and Diane Haugen, from Reporter Jim Walsh, Minneapolis Star/Tribune re iNetGlobal:

Jim Walsh response, published as a blog “post” in lieu of a “comment”:  Refer to http://cheapclix.net/to-jim-walsh-minneapolis-startribune/

__________________________________________________________

“I am following up on several of the points made during the hearing for future stories. Unfortunately, space and time limitations do have an impact on what I could write immediately after the hearing. 

I think you misunderstand my job. I am not a part of the federal government. I was not notified by the federal government prior to the raid, the newspaper was called by someone who saw federal agents there. My office is located about a mile away and I walked over. Regarding your allegations of media bias, I stand by what I told you yesterday. I made attempts to talk to iNetGlobal employees and Mr. Renner. None would talk, on the record. That is their right, but to say that I did not try to talk to them for their side of the story is inaccurate. Regarding “Guilty until Proven Innocent,” perhaps you should take up that complaint with the U.S. Secret Service, which has made the Ponzi scheme allegations against Mr. Renner and iNetGlobal. 

I did mention in the story that Judge Frank asked about a partial release of funds and would address the issue later.

Finally, I have no desire to ever (pee) on your grave and I appreciate you and your wife talking to me after the hearing. I look forward to having a chance to talk to you again in the future.”

Thank you for your response, and we look forward to your updates about the iNetGlobal court hearing status, Mr. Walsh.

Thanks for visiting! If you haven't already done so and would like, please subscribe to this blog so I can keep you up to date on all current activities.